All societies worldwide sustain their emotional homeostatis by using children as poison containers.

What is a poison-container? The term can be found at the History of Child Abuse essay at The Institute for Psychohistory. The Institute for Psychohistory. You can also read about poison-containers and child abuse at TM8k .

Important note : I do NOT agree with Lloyd's claim that modern western societies have reductions in child abuse. The Forbidden Truth is that child abuse is more rampant, and more societaly sponsered than ever before. It is often the case that current societies cannot be critisized by experts, and it may well be that Llyod has refrained from revealing the Truth on western cultures.

Child abuse sustains society, it runs society. At the same time, society is desperately trying to create an illusion of decency.

It does this via various child-protection "stunts" where a tiny percentage of children are "saved" (i.e. deliberately abused, then have a break in said abuse) and that is broadcast all over the media, as a morbidly false "proof" of the societal claim of benelovence towards children.

1. You need a licence to drive a car, fly a plane and so on.
2. One of the most important and difficult task is raising a whole new human being.
3. Children should not be subject to mass child abuse.

A. Society, if it was legitimate, would order that all parents undergo a rigerous parental-suitability test, where it would have to be proven that they can properly raise a child.

Any parent failing to meet the needs of the child, would result in the child being removed by society, and being placed in specially built benelovent child-raising centres.

Currently, all foster-home and boys-home type systems are deliberatly designed to be unreliable and unstable. They are made to be as bad or worse (on average) than the family unit abuse prisons that alternatively house children. This is to falsely lend legitimacy to the family unit structure, which is one of the primary core building blocks of society.

This structure is designed to give legal adults a child-slave, to abuse and mould into their own graven image. Each generation of children are sacrificed to their parents in order to appease the adult population of their own childhood torments.

OMG I love you for bringing this up. I was thinking about it the other day, and to me, it seems like a smart idea. There are so many parents out there who don't deserve to have kids, because they end up abusing or selling them. There should be rules for people to get licenses if they pass a, say, test. It doesn't seem right at all, and I agree, but given how some people seem to not understand the idea of having and raising a child, a license should be required.

__________________
"With your dominant arm, you grab the reality.
With your other arm, you uphold the morality."
~ MUCC - Libra

[This looks familiar, probably because I had similiar thoughts the other day]

I believe, in a beautiful and perfect world, there should be an lisence required (or equivalent) to raise childs (just like it's asked if you want to adopt a child) since not every human has what it takes to do so. Raising a child should be taken more seriously, I don't think every parents realize how IMPORTANT their opinion and acts are to their child(s).

That being said, I already see people complaning about their freedom and right of giving life, or even people not declaring they have babies, etc... Getting that kind of lisence shouldn't be an option, but I don't see how we can control it~

There is no such thing as the god creature. Although it's probably just an expression, I always take opportunities to point out that the god-myth is a toxic lie.

Then you might be one of the very, very few humans who possess a sane and rational insight into the raising of children.

That is correct. Although I dont know exactly what you mean by "selling". That could mean literally selling, or selling them out.

Yes, again you are correct. Any sane, benelovent and rational Truth-based society would do exactly that. However, all human societies on planet Earth are malevolent, deranged lie-based structures.

It is 100% right that parental licenses should be required. And it does not just seem 100% right, it is right.

Believe what you like. You cannot spell believe without lie.

The idea that the world has to be perfect in order to realise that children require protection from abusive parents is insane and malevolent. You are saying "Only if there was no problem should we consider solving it".

The Truth is that in any human society that has ever existed, there is a complete need and requirement to protect children and ensure they are properly cared for.

Incorrect. The current adoption test do not represent Truth. They are malevolently grossly inadequate. Special Truth-based and ultra-through parental tests are required.

Many humans do not currently have what it takes to do so.

Some parents are neglectful this way. Some are "refrigerator mothers". Some are deliberately abusive. All of these are child-abusers.

In this case, the so-called "freedom" is just a smokescreen for the direct moral societal permission to own and abuse child-slaves. They dont want any legitimate freedom. They just want to abuse their children, but at the same time cannot admit that this is their real motivation and cause.

The idea that subjecting children to inadequate parents is a form of "freedom" is ridiculous and malevolently insane.

Incorrect. Parental licenses have nothing to do with pro-creation. Anyone can still have offspring, they just cannot have any entitlement to raise them. The child must be raised by benevolent and competent parents, proven by their successful passing of child-raising tests and acquisition of a license.

Society already has mental control over almost every and all citizen-slaves. It would be impossible to raise a child and not declare the birth if Truth-based parental-license reforms were in place.

Car licenses are easily controlled, as are all forms of license. Who cares for children are the easiest thing to regulate. Any difficulties would be no excuse for not trying and doing the 100% best that is possible to protect children.

The benefits of near-zero child abuse would be reflected in every aspect of society automatically.

there is a point I'd like to bring up that perhaps wealthy people will not understand. Alot of poor Southeast Asians sell their children because it's the best chance/opportunity that a child might potentially have in his/her life. In this situation it's easy to conclude the worst scenario because it's a touchy issue. The reality is they're parents all the same in the end and do the best they can...although, I'm sure a small percentage of these people sell their kids just for the hell of it.

__________________
life is what you make it

I find it hard to bring myself to support "licensing Biology", but there are times when I really really want to say to someone, "You need to prove yourself a competent parent, else your children should be taken away from you."

So I agree with the sentiment. Just not the particular method being put forward here.

__________________
"Lemme tell you somethin' you already know. The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a mean, ugly, nasty place. And I don't care how tough you are, it will beat you down to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it! You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't about how hard you hit. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward."
-Sylvester Stallone as Rocky Balboa, Rocky Balboa, 2006.

Je crois that I can spell glauben however the hell I want. And, it would appear that my creencias on the subject are quite true...

__________________
When God Made ME, He had the mold hermetically sealed for future use.
my blog: http://laiam.knotnav.com

There is no mention of licensing biology. Biology is nothing to do with the subject at hand.

All prospective parents should have to prove their ability beforehand. It is always too late to wait until the damage is done with children.

There was no sentiment. Forbidden Truth, analysis, reason, clear thinking were all things involved in the parental license proposal. Sentiment does not come into Forbidden Truth.

The "method" is somewhat unclear as to meaning.

You got me wrong on that sir (I supposed your a "he').
I believe that in a perfect world it would be like that. In deed it's not real, I think it'll be like that in a perfect and beautiful world but obviously ours isn't~.

Yeah, I agree with you, that Idea is completely insane and I'd even say stupid. I don't know how you came to the conclusion that I was thinking that way though o.o

*bip noise that you hear in the TV shows to tell you didn't have the wrong answers* ~Incorrect. Actually, it's a very complex and adaptated test that you have to do in order to adopt child (atleast, in Canada). I followed one of my teacher (don't ask questions) in highschool as she was telling me everyday what she had to do and everything for the adoption. They don't let anybody pass easly, they refuse a lot of people.


...Kay, what's the difference, except for the words you used, between what I said and what you did?

How can we really tell? Some thoughts they we're going to be "good parents" but realized they don't love "THAT MUCH" their child so they don't really pay attention to them. Even though, that might be a small percentage of the whole "bad parents" out there. I don't ignore the possibility of malevolent parents~


Yep, at some points, I agree with you. What I meant to say was how people WOULD complain (I'm not saying that I do, it's not because I speak for "other people" that I include myself in that) about these kind of stuff because (as I said before, I had similar thoughts about this and spoke with some people) that's what I heard from others.


Don't you think people already do this? not declare a child, it's pretty easy for the "illegal underground" people (Street gangs, Mortars,etc.) to do so. I'm sure people already do this, I can't prove it nor can you prove they don't.

How many people drives even without Car licenses?

I agree, and that would be a good improvement to mankind itself.

The whole thing of the "license" is something that I fully agree with, don't get me wrong on that, it just sounds impossible to me to control that kind of thing in our current socitiy. There's a huge difference between driving a car and (thinking that we have the control) "controlling" who has the right to do so and raising a child and (thinking that we have the control) "controlling" who can and cannot.