Actually i have hunted.... and sure thats a challenge but the whole point is the kill and that part of it is no challenge at all, anyone with descent aim and patience can kill something with a gun... take that same experience.. and challenge of the hunt... and make your way close enough to make hand to hand combat with such an animal and i fear you'd have you ass handed to you. a deer can be a very powerful animal when provoked.

No sheyt, Einstein.
The point was that humans have intellectual traits that are not found in the animal kingdom.
Gunpowder was invented in China and is used as an explosive component in fireworks as well as in almost all types of weaponry.
The bleeding hearts(you know who you are)will whine, moan and bitch about hunters killing an animal, but they are the first ones to demand that animals be thinned out in populated areas. Why do you think animals end up in heavily populated areas?

You probably think that animals are happy living in the local zoo. LOL

metrosexual

Yeah well, If I was dumb enough to challenge a deer hand to hand, I'd obviously need to have my ass handed to me.
Maybe I should challenge a deer to a game of chess too?


Humans have the innate ability to perform tasks which no other animal can master.

Also, I've known guys who couldn't hit a barn from 10 feet, but I can see why it's important for you to minimize the skill of a good shooter, especially when you're trying to minimize the skill it takes to be a good hunter and a good steward of nature.

Most hunters have more knowledge and love for animals than all the bleeding hearts that denounce a sport they know very little about.
Sheesh.

i dunno i think hulk hogan would have ripped the limbs off the deer it probably would have been a quite different scenario.

What gets me is that you are condescending in every post you've made in this thread and you assume things. And you missed my point. You wanted to call people hypocrites for condemning gunpowder (though I've never heard anybody in their right mind condemn GUNPOWDER, actually, I've never heard anybody at all) and I was stating that killing an animal with it and making fireworks are so different that it was a stupid comment to make. Straw man arguments.

Just stop. You're trying to discredit an entire vegan movement with well thought out ideas, by using straw men arguments and insults (bleeding hearts? C'mon). Have you met a vegan that was like that? If you have, that's great but I've met many more who aren't like you say.


I probably think animals are happy living in the local zoo? No, I don't actually. And I don't support circuses either.
I'm going to start throwing LOLs at the end or beginning of my posts in an attempt to scoff opposing views. And calling people metro-sexuals because I'm a big manly man.

It's funny because I'm not even a vegan yet.

Why do you call people metro-sexuals?

LOL


Edit: Lmao, hunters with more love for animals than the people who don't want them to die.

lol, anyone with common sense on how sites work can use a gun effectively. of course with the further the distance, their are other variables that come into play such as wind temperature and many other things. but those factors don't even matter at most of the range you would shoot a deer from... now a bow and arrow... those factors come into play at almost any distance.

And also, you don't need to have gone hunting to denounce it. The idea of it is more than enough. Another straw man argument.

I don't need to have murdered someone to know it's wrong. That line of thinking is ridiculous.

Shit you quoted me before I changed the horrible wording, lol You jerk!

Then change it and I'll edit and requote you!