Quote:
Originally Posted by jol I think that the point The_the is basically trying to make is that God has to exist, because nothing comes before something. Otherwise, things would just be *created.*
The problem with arguing that Science doesn't support God is the fact that God can transcend science. Maybe god made the universe, and then stuck science in to make it work. You can't simply say that God doesn't exist because science doesn't show it, because, if God does indeed exist, he is so far above Scientific law that it becomes stupid to make that comparison.
Then, you can say "well, then what created God? He can't just be infinite." Ah, but that is only because Science says that he can't be. Maybe God created time after he set up the universe to, again, just like with science, make things work.
Science and math themselves are based on conjecture, so you can't come to ultimately definitive conclusions using either. |
Darn, I'm almost embaressed ( spelling?) that I didn't simplify it that well. Good work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillibean Jol I don't think anyone is saying that science is proof god doesn't exist. I definitely don't think that is the case. There is no definitive proof either way. People have to look at the world and come to conclusions for themselves. |
Ok, I know where to get you on this now. Define "proof" and where you think it can possibly be discovered, Gilli. There is proof, just conceptually. The only reason to not believe in some sort of God's existence is through a poor or misunderstanding of logic/ valid philosophy, or simply having a weak left hemisphere of one's brain.
If logic itself is applicable/ useful/ valid, God must necessarily exist.
READ my formal explanation of God's existence. I'll find the page it's on.