PureTalkForum Debate & Discussion Forum  

Go Back   PureTalkForum Debate & Discussion Forum > General Chat > Literature



Discussing Submitted Literature

This is a discussion on Discussing Submitted Literature within the Literature forums, part of the General Chat category; This original post is about Obdurate's submitted work. This thread, however, can also serve as a discussion thread on ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-02-07, 08:06 PM
Joad's Avatar
Post Whore

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: La Florida
Posts: 877
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Joad has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to Joad
Default Discussing Submitted Literature

This original post is about Obdurate's submitted work. This thread, however, can also serve as a discussion thread on later works by the same person/ other people.
Is this part of the book you said you were working on? I just remembered you saying something like that from long ago. Well, to throw my two cents in, i found it unique. The footnotes were like the story within a story. I like that. A lot. The sampling you shared with us kind of reminded me of a familiar essay...With Social Criticism. Anyway, I loved the first 2 pages of criticism/comments. I found it varied and comical at some points. Especially from the "kids on the internet." Anyway, the 3rd page was rather disturbing. Rather... it was very disturbing.

On the actual story. From my personal view, meaning "to me," it was as if the footnotes were the real story, and the actual "story" were the footnotes. Switch the roles, and thats how it was for me. The final "footnote" was awesome. My favorite quote:

"There are other people who aren’t actually the leaders of anything but want to be, like Dr. Phil, who preaches his word as gospel and once someone tries to “fight back,” he/she is dismissed almost instantly or just told he/she is wrong, simple and plain."

Loved it. The final footnote, however, i didn't link to the "story." The final footnote to me was like "the point" and the "most important part" of the sample. It was the reason why you wrote. That's all i can say when i try to explain it in words. I'm sorry if this was not what you were trying to communicate, but that's how i interpreted. Maybe I'm deaf.

If you ever plan to release a sample again, put it on the PTF share; I'd be glad to read it.
Since the older thread was locked, people who didnt get a chance to read and comment could do so here. As long as we don't resort to profanity. We can criticize w/out profanity...right?
__________________
I need a new sig.

I heart Sarah Palin.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-07, 08:11 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Posts: 829
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wolf is a name known to all
Default Re: Discussing Submitted Literature

Good idea.

To Obdurate: Sorry about all the things I said in the other post.
Also, Obdurate, if you would like to explain what it all means, I'd be more than glad to listen.

For all of you that haven't/won't see that post, here's Obdurate's story [All credits to Obdurate]:
Attached Files
File Type: doc It Just Wants To Be Loved2.doc (84.0 KB, 1 views)

Last edited by Wolf; 06-02-07 at 08:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-07, 08:13 PM
AJ's Avatar
AJ AJ is offline
Founder and Former Owner
Administrator [for now]
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,360
Thanks: 196
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
AJ has disabled reputation
Default Re: Discussing Submitted Literature

Great idea. Yes, let's try to give constructive criticism, but without going over the edge.

I'll stick this so it won't be forgotten for future submissions.

AJ
__________________
"Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will." -Romans 12:2
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-07, 10:15 PM
Obdurate's Avatar
[Contact Kovich for custom title]

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 15
Thanked 45 Times in 41 Posts
Obdurate has a reputation beyond reputeObdurate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Discussing Submitted Literature

Geez, thanks people. I didn't really expect THIS.
Wolf, it's fine you didn't like it. I don't expect everybody to. We could go on and on about what happened but yes, I know that you read different kind of stuff. That's fine, that's just not what I'm aiming for. Maybe the second book will be more simplistic, I don't know, like I said in the thread, I only write to bleed. I do want your criticisms, though. Just know that I did write it the way I wrote it because of the kind of criticisms you gave me. I knew that was coming.

I was really waiting for you, Joad, to reply so I'm glad you made this thread. I was disappointed when it got closed cuz I knew you would discuss it and I knew Brandon wanted to read it (even harassed me for it , just kidding).

So I guess a lil explanation/reply to Joad...

What you said about the footnotes was amazing.
The page with the penis (how many guys do you know think that their dicks make them men, so why not put a giant penis on a page to parody/satirize that?) had the names of the footnote people. The order that the names are in is the order that the people read the book.
It's a book that's been passed down by person to person in some way, even if it isn't directly. As it is now, you don't know too much about the people but as it goes on, they get their own stories but I don't know if they're gonna connect or not. Just imagine a library book that you take out and you see that people have underlined passages that meant a lot to them, or passages that they could use in a thesis, etc. That's what I'm going for. That's why it looks sloppy with footnotes all over the place.
And the reasoning for this is because... how you relate to books is more important than the story, which brings me to this:

Quote:
On the actual story. From my personal view, meaning "to me," it was as if the footnotes were the real story, and the actual "story" were the footnotes. Switch the roles, and thats how it was for me.
That theory holds grounds unless I'm misunderstanding what you're saying. There's the two levels of footnotes, the kind that's included in the "plot" and the people "reading." I hope that makes sense.

Haha, the reviews... I admit, it's random, and it loses its effect in the form of a document, but when it's as a book... just picture the reviews you always see at the beginning of books. I just wanted to parody that, and at the same time, kinda take the ammo away from critics. My book will get called pretentious, but I called it pretentious first. I mean... in that big long list of people who will be in awe of me, MY NAME is included, my GIRLFRIEND is included, my friends are... a goalie in the NHL is, etc.

God, this is a long winded post. But it shall go on!
The last footnote really is just an activist relating. That's why everything the person says has to do with some kind of problem in the world. That's all any of these footnotes are. By doing so I'm studying my own book but that doesn't mean I'm explaining it. Some of the theories presented will lead you in the right direction, some won't.

The book deals heavily with perception. What's real and what's not?
It's also me waxing philosophical over the town I live in, and genres (but the genre thing isn't clear yet).
It's war on books, it's war on my own book.

But yeah, Joad... I really liked what you said about it. I liked how you analyzed the last footnote and what you said.

I enjoyed when Wolf called it a "book." More right than he thought, really.

Sorry for being so selfish here.

Last edited by Obdurate; 06-02-07 at 10:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-07, 10:30 PM
Joad's Avatar
Post Whore

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: La Florida
Posts: 877
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Joad has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to Joad
Default Re: Discussing Submitted Literature

Ah. I'm glad that a review from me was expected. I feel special. And I do understand you're explanation on the footnotes; in the penultimate paragraph referring to you're work, i only understood that the final paragraph was separate from the "plot." Thanks for clearing that up.

There was also something else i wanted to say, but right before i typed "Ah." i forgot what it was. Don't worry, i'll post that when i remember. Curses, i hate how that happens to me. I was really excited and wanted to type all this fast...
__________________
I need a new sig.

I heart Sarah Palin.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-02-07, 10:34 PM
Obdurate's Avatar
[Contact Kovich for custom title]

 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 15
Thanked 45 Times in 41 Posts
Obdurate has a reputation beyond reputeObdurate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Discussing Submitted Literature

Haha, well I'll be waiting eagerly for it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Literature Ich_Bin_Butler Suggestions, Feedback & Forum Help 4 02-21-07 06:33 PM



PTF is a division of IntellectToday.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Style by: kreativfantasy.com
Copyright ©2006 - 2008, PureTalkForum.com & IntellectToday