I would love to see a sequel to Donnie Darko - but it's not entirely possible with the way the movie ended!

The Butteryfly Effect was also a good movie but the sequel was totally irrelevant and sucked beyond belief.

The X-Files came out with a movie a few years back, and just came out with another one recently - so I guess that counts as a sequel.

In other words, I'm not really sure - the only movies that come to mind are ones that have one, and it sucks, can't have one, or do and it's good. I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place...

i hate when people say that sequels suck... cause its just so not true... sure you have a few bad sequels, but i think good sequels far outnumber the bad.

the original star wars 4 5 6... i felt as though these got better the further it went along.
now the newer 1 2 3 meh... not so much

harry potter was doing good with its sequels until this latest one... i fell alseep in it.

the tremors series got better and better but then again they are b movies.

im sure obdurate could name alot of sequels that didn't suck.

Tremors as in giant underground worms?

that was the first one they get better

I didn't know there were sequels. We watched it yesterday and I'd forgotten Kevin Bacon was even in the movie so obviously I wasn't too moved by it.

like i said the sequels are better, and the points im trying to make is that the common thing is sequels suck and it just not true... there have been lots of really great sequels that are better than the original movie.